Join the conversation

Sign in to join this conversation, and others like it, in the communities you care about.

Wekan

Wekan is an open-source kanban board (Trello like) which allows a card-based task and to-do management.

Wekan / General

Lockout this that cannot be webhooked

Lockout this that cannot be webhooked

Wekan/General · March 19, 2020 at 7:59pm

Lockout this that cannot be webhooked

Wekan / General · March 19, 2020 at 7:59pm

When you add or delete a card, or if you add or delete a swimlane you get a webhook payload regardless of how the integration was registered. If you use universal webhooks (not the one assigned by a board specific integration) you probably get a webhook showing you created a board. Either way you do get a board deletion webhook if you built that board through the api and added an integration.

But for some reason there are NO webhooks for any changes you make. If you rename a card or rename a swimlane or rename a board, you get silence. I tried tracking and watching options and still nothing. LMK if I am doing this wrong, please.

So if I cannot track the user making changes I would need instead to prevent the user from making changes I cannot track through a web hook.

I have run into this issue editing (PUT) through the api. There are not editing functions through the api to rename some things or coloring things. Simple solution was just to change things in Mongodb to rename a board or a swimlane or card or add or change a color in a swimlane.

But the reverse is not as easy. Unless I capture changes to mongo as events there is no easy solution to not getting a webhook back on a user change of something simple. If you add card NP. if you edit a card no go.

So to lockout changes...... are there methods to do that? I see many true/false values that are in the database (no that you can always edit them through the api), but if you change mongo values you can change what the user is permitted to do in the GUI with the boards?

allowsSubtasks": true, "allowsAttachments": true, "allowsChecklists": true, "allowsComments": true, "allowsDescriptionTitle": true, "allowsDescriptionText": true, "allowsActivities": true, "allowsLabels": true, "allowsAssignee": true, "allowsMembers": true, "allowsRequestedBy": true, "allowsAssignedBy": true, "allowsReceivedDate": true, "allowsStartDate": true, "allowsEndDate": true, "allowsDueDate": true,

Can I, and if so, what do I change to prevent users from renaming things that do not give you webhooks?

Thanks

Load previous messages

April 1, 2020 at 9:54pm

But there are many missing PUT routines in the api that let me edit things. The way I have solved that is to use an ssh connection to mongo. Please note that if you add attriubutes to boards like you said and the the POST route does not permit adding those then I either have to use a PUT routine or use mongo to modify the attributes on those boards to block certain features.

    • reply
    • like

    Could you please summarize again what you actually would like to have?

      • reply
      • like

      Hmm OK you mean more PUT routines

        • reply
        • like

        right now the attributes for things not supported in webhooks is all I need

          • reply
          • like

          anything else is great but not required

            • reply
            • like

            if I edit something in the GUI and there is no webhook then I do not have a solution to keep systems in sync

              • reply
              • like

              so the only thing essential now is to prevent users from manipulating things in the GUI that doe not webhook. Which is renaming or cards and swimlanes or Boards

                • reply
                • like

                the PUTS would be nice but I can work around that Lauri

                  • reply
                  • like

                  Thank you again

                    • reply
                    • like

                    Do you mean that webhooks for rename Board/Swimlane/Card are missing?

                      • reply
                      • like

                      no PUTs on the api side and no webhooks on the other side

                        • reply
                        • like

                        look eventually we will have everything. but until that great day just being able to turn off users from messing with stuff we cannot track is a great solution

                          • reply
                          • like

                          I think even if all the webhooks and PUTS were there its still powerful letting the admin or programmer decide what you can and cannot do in the GUI

                            • reply
                            • like

                            you agree?

                              • reply
                              • like

                              :)

                                • reply
                                • like

                                Well, maybe when I figure it out. Currently that disabling does not work yet and that code is not yet in Wekan. I'm making new Wekan release with other changes that already work.

                                  • reply
                                  • like

                                  It depends on each day which changes and features are ready. I do release new Wekan version about once a day.

                                    • reply
                                    • like

                                    Or once a month, or something in between.

                                      • reply
                                      • like

                                      Those prevent rename changes do conflict a little with existing roles of BoardAdmin/Normal/NoComments/CommentOnly/Worker, I'll need to think how to handle those

                                        • reply
                                        • like

                                        One way would be to change that Roles system to have unlimited amount of roles, by adding new role names and permissions for each role

                                          • reply
                                          • like

                                          I have not tried implementing it yet

                                            • reply
                                            • like

                                            It would probably be needed with Teams/Organizations etc

                                              • reply
                                              • like

                                              so the users would have a role that block certain kind of editing?

                                                • reply
                                                • like

                                                Yes. All current roles are like that. Someone also requested "Read Only" role, but I have not implemented it yet.

                                                  • reply
                                                  • like